Burroughs George (d. 1692)

Burroughs, George (d. 1692) Minister accused of witchcraft and executed in the Salem Witches hysteria in Massachusetts in 1692 to 1693.

George Burroughs served as minister of Salem Village from 1680 to 1682.

He was a man of good reputation, having graduated from Harvard in 1670.

He had distinguished himself as a preacher in Maine, especially in the face of hostilities from Indians.

Invited to Salem Village, he had no idea of the hornet’s nest of social and political infighting that awaited him.

Not everyone was pleased to have him.

After moving, Burroughs and his wife lived for a time with Thomas and Rebecca Putnam.

Later, when the witch-burning times hysteria broke out, the Putnams alleged that Burroughs had treated his wife cruelly.

Burroughs’ wife died in September 1681.

By then, Burroughs had not been paid his salary for some time, a casualty of the local infighting.

He went into debt to pay for his wife’s funeral.

Perhaps it was the combination of grief over his loss and frustration at the sentiments raging in the village, but Burroughs decided not to pursue the monies owed him and quit his job.

He returned to Maine, where he became a pastor in Wells.

In 1683, a suit was brought against Burroughs for the unpaid debt for funeral expenses.

The suit was dropped when Burroughs demonstrated that the village owed him back salary, which could be applied to the debt.

The situation fomented ill will against the minister.

Burroughs was long gone from Salem Village when the witchcraft hysteria erupted in 1692.

Burroughs was decried as a witch.

Twelve-year-old Ann Putnam said that on April 20 the specter of a minister appeared and tortured and choked her, urging her to write in his devil’s book.

She identified the specter as Burroughs.

She said he told her he had three wives and that he had bewitched the first two to death.

He also said he had killed Mrs Lawson and her daughter Ann; he had bewitched many soldiers to death; and he had turned Abigail Hobbs into a witch.

He claimed to be a conjurer, which was above a witch.

On May 4, Burroughs was arrested at his home in Wells, Maine—while he sat at his dinner table with his family, according to lore—and brought immediately to Salem.

In his examination on May 9, he was accused of witchcraft, of not attending communion on some occasions and of not baptizing all but his eldest child.

These were grave sins for a minister.

Like others who had been cried out against, Burroughs was simply astounded both at the accusations and the girls falling into fits claiming that he was tormenting and biting them.

Putnam said that on May 8, the apparition of Burroughs appeared to her again and told her that she would soon see his dead two wives, who would tell her lies.

She saw two ghosts of women in burial shrouds.

They said that Burroughs had been cruel to them and had killed them.

The first wife said she had been stabbed beneath the armpit and the wound covered with sealing wax.

She pulled aside her burial shroud to show Putnam the wound.

Putnam also said that the ghosts of Lawson and her child appeared and said they, too, had been murdered by Burroughs.

Later, Putnam saw the ghost of Goody Fuller, who said Burroughs had killed her over a dispute with her husband.

Others, including eight confessed witches, came forward against him.

Burroughs was a man of small stature but had exceptional strength for his size.

It was alleged that his unusual strength came from the Devil, and that he reveled in letting others know of his occult powers, also granted by the Devil.

By the time the testimonies were done, Burroughs was the ringleader of all the witches, tempting and seducing them, giving them poppets for evil spells.

Burroughs was tried on August 5. Found guilty, he was condemned to death by hanging.

On August 19, he and four others were driven to Gallows Hill in an open cart.

He mounted the gallows and then preached a sermon, ending with the Lord’s Prayer.

His flawless recitation of the prayer upset the onlookers, for it was strongly believed that a witch could not say the prayer without stumbling.

Cotton Mather, watching astride his white horse, kept the execution on track by telling the crowd that Burroughs was not an ordained minister and, thus, the Devil could help him recite the prayer.

The executions proceeded.

Burroughs and the others were cut down and dragged by halters to a shallow hole about two feet deep.

Burroughs’ shirt and pants were pulled off, and an old pair of pants belonging to one of the executed were put on him.

The bodies were barely covered with dirt.

Burroughs’ chin and one hand stuck out from the ground, along with a foot of one of the others.

After his execution, more stories of his dealings with the Devil circulated through Salem.

The citizens seemed to need a sense of justification at having killed the man who once led their church.

Mather made special effort to spread disparaging stories.

Filled with loathing of Burroughs,

Mathers said he could hardly speak his name

He would not have done so except that the state of Massachusetts asked for accounts of the Salem trials to be included in Mather’s book, On Witchcraft: Being the Wonders of the Invisible World.

Gowdie, Isobel:1662

Scottish witch whose stories of wild sexual escapades with the Devil titillated and shocked her stern neighbors and reinforced the prevailing beliefs in witches as evil creatures bent on destroying their fellow man.

Isobel Gowdie, an attractive woman with red hair, a color associated with witches, voluntarily confessed to witchcraft on four occasions in April and May 1662.

The confessions in themselves astonished the local folk, but what was even more astonishing was Gowdie’s assertion that she had been engaging in obscene activities for 15 years.

No one, apparently, had ever caught on, not even her husband.

According to her confessions, Gowdie’s involvement with the Devil began in 1647, when she met him in the shape of a man in gray in Auldearne, the remote area in Morayshire where she lived.

He enticed her into his service, and that very evening baptized her as a witch in the local church with her own blood, which he sucked from her.

He gave her a Devil’s mark on her shoulder and renamed her Janet.

Much of her witchcraft, she said, was taught to her by fairies. Gowdie said she joined a coven of 13 witches—thus bolstering the myth that all witches organize in groups of 13—which met regularly for sabbats marked by sexual orgies with demons and the Devil, feasting and dancing.

She proudly explained how she sneaked away to attend these affairs without her husband knowing: she substituted a broomstick for herself in bed, and he never realized the difference.

She and her sister witches flew off to the sabbats on corn straws, beanstalks and rushes, which they charmed into flight by shouting, “Horse and Hattock, in the Devil’s name!”

If someone below spotted them and did not cross himself, they would shoot him down with elf arrows.

Gowdie delighted in describing her intercourse with the Devil: how he plunged an enormous, scaly penis into her, causing excruciating pain, and how his semen was cold as ice.

As painful as she made it sound, Gowdie also apparently enjoyed it.

If she or the other witches displeased the Devil, he beat them with scourges and wool cards.

She also told how she and her coven members tormented their neighbors.

They raised storms by beating wet rags upon stones while reciting incantations.

They made farmland sterile by ploughing it with a miniature plough drawn by toads.

They hexed children by sticking pins in dolls.

They blasted one farmer’s crops by digging up the body of an unchristened child and burying it in his manure heap.

They shot elf arrows at people to injure or kill them. If they became bored with tormenting others, the witches amused themselves by metamorphosing into animals, usually hares and cats.

Stunned by these stories, the local authorities had Gowdie stripped and searched for the Devil’s mark, which they found.

The records give no reason as to why Gowdie one day decided to confess these lurid tales, without any prompting or suspicion upon her.

Furthermore, she welcomed punishment:

“I do not deserve to be seated here at ease and unharmed, but rather to be stretched on an iron rack: nor can my crimes be atoned for, were I to be drawn asunder by wild horses.”

In Letters on Demonology and Witchcraft (1830), Sir Walter Scott speculated that “this wretched creature 144 Gowdie, Isobel was under the dominion of some peculiar species of lunacy.”

In The Occult (1971), Colin Wilson suggests she was a highly sexed woman with a vivid imagination, who turned to fantasies to alleviate the boredom of a dull existence; at some point, her fantasies became real to her.

But after 15 years, the excitement of having a secret grew thin, and there was only one way to recharge it—by making a public confession.

The records also do not indicate what became of Gowdie or the other unfortunate Auldearne witches she named.

Cole, Ann (17th century)

Accused witch in Hartford,Connecticut, who was believed to be under demonic possession.

The case was recorded in a letter written by Reverend John Whiting, which in turn was published by Increase Mather in An Essay for the Recording of Illustrious
Providences (1684).

Ann Cole was described by Mather as a woman of great integrity and piety. In 1662,

she was living in the house of her father—“a godly man”—when she began having bizarre fits,

“wherein her Tongue was improved Witches sacrificing cock and snake to raise hailstorm (Ulrich Molitor, De Ianijs et Phitonicius Mulieribus, 1489) Cole, Ann by a Daemon to express things which she herself knew nothing of,” Mather wrote.

Sometimes the discourses went on for hours.

Cole named other persons as witches and described how they intended to carry out “mischievous designs” against herself and others, by afflicting bodies and spoiling names.

The demons told her to “run to the rock.”

Cole’s fits happened in public as well as in private.

They were violent physically as well as verbally.

She even disrupted church services, causing one person to faint.

At times Cole lapsed into gibberish.

Then the demons said they would change her language so that she could tell no more tales.

She began speaking English with a precise Dutch accent, describing how a woman who lived next to a Dutch family had been afflicted by a strange pinching
of her arms at night.

Cole’s Dutch accent was so good that others pronounced it to be genuine and impossible for Cole to imitate on her own.

One of the alleged witches named by Cole was her next-door neighbor, Rebecca Greensmith, who was convicted and executed in 1693.

A man and a woman named by Cole were given the swimming test of being bound and thrown into water.

They neither floated nor sank, but bobbed like buoys, half in and half out of the water.

A witness, protesting that anyone bound with their hands to their feet would not sink (and therefore be guilty), underwent the test himself.

He was lowered gently into the water, not thrown in as were the accused, and promptly sank.

It is not known how many others named by Cole were accused of witchcraft and executed; some fled Hartford and were never seen again.

Once the accused were dead or gone, Cole recovered and had no more fits.

She resumed her life as “a serious Christian.”

Twenty years later, Whiting reported that she was still devout and free of fits.

One possible explanation for Cole’s fits is multiple personality disorder.

More likely, her fits were brought on by intense fear of witchcraft, prevalent at the time.

Greensmith, Rebecca (17th century)

Hartford, Connecticut, woman accused of witchcraft, who confessed and was executed.

Rebecca Greensmith and her third husband, Nathaniel, lived next door to Ann Cole.

The couple was reasonably affluent, but Rebecca was considered a “lewd and ignorant” woman.

In 1662, when Cole was brought up on charges of witchcraft, Greensmith was already languishing in prison on charges of witchcraft, which she denied.

Cole named several accomplices, including Greensmith.

Rebecca was brought before a magistrate and was confronted with the accusations of Cole that had been recorded by Reverend John Whiting and Joseph Haines.

At first Greensmith was astonished and protested her innocence once again, but soon confessed that all Cole had said was true.

Greensmith said that she and others had familiarity with the Devil, but had not signed a Devil’s pact with him.

However, she had gone with him whenever he had called her.

The Devil told her that at Christmas the witches would have a fine celebration and would all sign the pact with him.

Greensmith was questioned again on the following day by Haines.

She told him that she was in such a rage that she could have torn him limb from limb.

Haines persisted in his interrogation, and Greensmith broke down again, saying that she felt as if her own flesh was being pulled from her bones.

She again confessed to the accusations.

She said that the Devil appeared to her in the shape of a deer or a fawn and skipped around her until she was not frightened.

The Devil began conversing with her and then frequently had sexual intercourse with her.

“I liked it very much,” Greensmith stated.

She said she met with other witches at a place not far from her home.

The witches all flew to the meetings in different animal shapes, one of them being a cow.

Greensmith was sentenced to death and was hanged in January 1663.

Her husband, Nathaniel, was also accused of witchcraft by association and was executed, despite his lack of confession of guilt.

Good, Dorcas (17th century)

The youngest victim of the Salem Witches hysteria of 1692–93.

Dorcas Good was the daughter of Sarah Good, one of the first persons to be accused of witchcraft in Salem, Massachusetts, in 1692.

Only four years old, Dorcas was also accused of being a witch.

In a childlike fashion, she readily confessed to witchcraft, which she said she learned from her mother.

Dorcas was arrested about a month after her mother, in March 1692. She was cried out against by the afflicted girls along with Rebecca Nurse and Elizabeth Procter.

The girls accused Dorcas of tormenting them, saying she was taking supernatural revenge for the arrest of her mother.

When brought up for examination, Dorcas was confronted by three of the afflicted girls, Ann Putnam, Mary Walcott and Mercy Lewis.

Putnam and Walcott fell into their fits, claiming Dorcas had bitten, pinched and choked them.

They showed the marks of pinpricks and little teeth on their arms.

The evidence was convincing to the magistrates and the onlookers.

Little Dorcas was an easy mark and became the second person after the slave Tituba to confess to witchcraft.

Asked if she had a familiar, Dorcas said yes, it was a small snake that sucked at the lowest point of her forefinger.

Dorcas showed the examiners a red mark at the spot, about the size of a flea bite.

In all likelihood, it was a flea bite, but it was accepted as a witch’s mark or Devil’s mark by the examiners.

Asked who gave her the familiar, the child replied that it was not the “Black Man,” the Devil, but her mother.

Dorcas continued to give evidence against her mother, testifying at her trial that Sarah had three familiars in the shapes of birds that hurt the afflicted children and others.

One was black and one was yellow.

Because of her confession, Dorcas was not tried for witchcraft.

She was sent to prison in Boston, along with her mother, for about seven to eight months.

There she was treated abominably, as were the other prisoners, and was confined in chains.

They were too poor to pay for their upkeep, and “the country” was billed for their food and blankets.

Her father, William Good—who testified against his own wife—wrote a letter to the General Court in 1710 in which he protested the damage done to his family, including Dorcas.

The child, he said, “hath ever since been very chargable, having little or no reason to govern herself.”

Burning Times

A term used by Witches and Pagans to refer to the period in Western history of intense witch-hunting and executions, generally the mid-15th to mid18th centuries.

Burning, one of the most extreme forms of execution, was urged by St. Augustine (354–430), who said that pagans, Jews, and heretics would burn forever in the eternal fire with the Devil unless saved by the Catholic Church.

During the Inquisition, charges of witchcraft were used against heretics, social outcasts, and enemies of the church.

Such individuals were declared to have renounced God and formed a compact with the Devil.

Fire is the element of purification, so nothing less than fire could negate the evil of witchcraft.

Jean Bodin, a 16th-century demonologist, stated in De la démonomanie des sorciers:

Even if the witch has never killed or done evil to man, or beast, or fruits, and even if he has always cured bewitched people, or driven away tempests, it is because he has renounced God and treated Satan that he deserves to be burned alive . . .

Even if there is no more than the obligation to the Devil, having denied God, this deserves the cruelest death that can be imagined.

Not all witches were burned at the stake; hanging was the preferred means of execution in some countries, including England and the American colonies.

In France, Scotland and Germany, it was customary to strangle condemned witches first, as an act of mercy, by either hanging or garroting and then burn them to ashes.

Nonetheless, many were burned alive, especially if they recanted their confession at the last moment or were unrepentant of their “crimes.”

The expenses of the burning—along with all the expenses of the trial and the stay in jail—were billed to the deceased’s relatives or estate.

Witch lynchings and burnings continued sporadically into the late 19th century in England, Europe and Latin America.

There are no reliable figures of the numbers of persons burned or otherwise executed for witchcraft.

Estimates by historians range from 200,000 to 1 million.

Pagan authors have cited 9 million as the number of victims, but this is an inflated figure without evidence of support.

The burning of a witch was a great public occasion.

The execution took place shortly after the sentencing, just long enough to hire an executioner, construct the execution site and gather the fuel.

In Scotland, a witch-burning was preceded by days of fasting and solemn preaching.

The witch was strangled first, and then her corpse—or sometimes her unconscious or semiconscious body—was tied to a stake or dumped into a tar barrel and set afire.

If the witch was not dead and managed to get out of the flames, onlookers shoved her back in.

Records of trials in Scotland report that burning a witch consumed 16 loads of peat plus wood and coal.

In 1608 witches in Brechin, Scotland was executed in the following manner, according to original records as cited in Enemies of God:

Bodin, Jean (1529–1596)

Bodin, Jean (1529–1596) French demonologist and political theorist who encouraged the vicious persecution of witches and helped fan the fires of the Inquisition throughout Europe.

Jean Bodin said that people who denied the existence of witchcraft were witches themselves and said that, with rare exceptions, no accused witch should go unpunished.

Bodin was born in Angers, France.

For a time, he served as a Carmelite monk.

He left the monastery for the University of Toulouse, where he became a professor of Roman law.

Bodin possessed a brilliant intellect and distinguished himself in his studies of philosophy, law, classics and economics. In 1561 he left Toulouse for Paris, where he worked in the service of the king.

But his book Six livres de la république, published in 1576, caused him to fall out of favor with the king because of its concept that sovereign power belonged to the people.

Bodin wrote other works of political theory, but he is best known for his treatise on witchcraft, De la démonomanie des sorciers (The Demonomania of Witches), published in 1580.

The book was an immediate success and was reprinted frequently throughout Europe.

Like the Malleus Maleficarum published nearly 100 years earlier, it served as a guide to witch-hunters and judges in the matters of identifying, prosecuting and executing witches.

Bodin drew on his own experience as a judge at numerous witchcraft trials.

Démonomanie describes witches, their methods of diabolic acts and their abilities, such as pacts with Satan (see Devil’s pact), flying through the air to their sabbats, copulating with incubi and succubi and casting evil spells.

It also acknowledges that there are good daemons as well as evil demons, and that good daemon can communicate with man and provide inspiration.

He himself had such a daemon, who whispered instructions in his ear.

Bodin believed that authorities were too soft in prosecuting witches, whom he saw less as heretics and more as social deviants.

He condoned convicting the accused on the basis of lies by informants, confessions made under torture, secret accusations and false promises of leniency.

He urged local authorities to encourage secret accusations by placing a black box in the church for anonymous letters.

He was adamant about torturing and punishing witches, saying that God would reject those who did not do so:

Those too who let the witches escape, or who do not punish them with the utmost rigor, may rest assured that they will be abandoned by God to the mercy of the witches.

And the country which shall tolerate this will be scourged with pestilences, famines, and wars; and those which shall take vengeance on the witches will be blessed by him and will make his anger cease.

Even children and invalids were not to be spared torture, as Bodin demonstrated time and again by his own example as judge.

Children, he said, should be forced to testify against their accused parents.

One of his favored methods was cauterizing flesh with a red-hot iron and then cutting out the putrefied flesh.

That torture, he said, was mild compared to the hell that awaited the condemned witch.

Bodin took exception with exorcism, however, which he said was both ineffective and dangerous to the exorcist.

Music was preferable as a form of exorcism; in the Old Testament, Saul’s possession had been calmed by music.

Bodin did not believe that a person could cause another to become possessed (see possession).

Bodin savagely criticized Johann Weyer, a Lutheran physician and contemporary, who opposed the burning of witches and maintained they were helpless victims.

Bodin said Weyer’s books should be burned.

Except for Démonomanie, which served the purpose of the church, all of Bodin’s other books on political theory were condemned by the Inquisition.

Bodin died in Laon, a victim of the bubonic plague.

Bishop, Bridget (d. 1692)

Bridget (d. 1692) The first victim of the Salem Witches hysteria in Massachusetts in 1692–93.

Bridget Bishop was the first to be accused and examined, and the first to be tried and executed.

Bishop was an easy target when the hysteria began.

She was not well regarded by her neighbors, for she owned a tavern and exhibited “loose” behavior.

She dressed provocatively, and some of her younger tavern patrons were known to stay well past closing, drinking and playing games.

According to the testimony lodged against Bishop, she had bewitched a baby and a girl to death, paid a man in disappearing money, caused various mishaps with carts and horses and paid nocturnal visits to a man as a glowing apparition that hopped around his room in a cloak.

She also had bewitched people into serious illnesses, caused people to argue violently and bewitched animals.

John Lowder, 24, a laborer, testified that Bishop tormented him numerous times after they argued over her chickens damaging the gardens of Lowder’s employer.

Lowder said he woke up one night to find Bishop sitting on his chest.

She tried to choke him.

Lowder also said that he had other dark bedroom visitors: a black pig and a flying demon that had the body of a monkey, the feet of a rooster and the face of an old man.

The demon told him he was sent by the Devil and promised him money if he would pledge himself.

Lowder chased the creature out of his room.

It disappeared, but he saw Bishop in the distance.

When he returned to his room, the demon came back.

Lowder invoked God and it flew out, causing apples to fall from trees.

It kicked gravel into Lowder’s stomach, and he was unable to eat for three days.

Cotton Mather said that when Bishop was brought to trial, he had no doubt of her guilt.

With a look, she brought in an invisible demon who damaged part of the courthouse.

Bishop was executed by hanging on June 10, 1692

Women who Burned

“It was not witches who burned. It was women.

Women who were seen as

Too beautiful

Too outspoken

Had too much water in the well

Who had a birthmark

Women who were too skilled with herbal medicine

Too loud

Too quiet

Too much red in her hair

Women who had a strong nature connection

Women who danced

Women who sung

or anything else, really.

Sisters testified and turned on each other when their babies were held under ice.

Children were tortured to confess their experiences with “witches” by being fake executed in ovens.

Women were held underwater and if they float, they were guilty and executed.

If they sunk and drowned they were innocent.

Women were thrown off cliffs.

Women were put in deep holes in the ground.

The start of this madness was years of famine, the war between religions, and lots of fear.

The churches said that witches, demons and the devil did exist and women were nothing but trouble.

As we see even today, there is often a scapegoat created.

Everything connected to a woman became feared, especially her sexuality.

It became labeled as dark and dangerous and was the core of the witch trials throughout the world.

Why has this been written?

Because the usage of words are important, especially when we are doing the work to pull these murky, repressed, and forgotten stories to the surface.

Because knowing our history is important when we are building a new world.

When we are doing the healing work of our lineages and as women.

To give the women who have slaughtered a voice, to give them redress and a chance of peace.

It was not witches who burned.

It was women.”

Burning at the Stake as a Punishment for Witches

Contrary to popular belief, witches were not burned at the stake in England, after the Reformation.

Instead, death sentences were carried out by hanging.

In Scotland, however, the sentence of burning was still inflicted.

However if the witches had confessed what they were ordered to confess, they were accorded the mercy of being strangled before being burnt.

If they refused to confess, they were burnt alive.

This custom was followed upon the Continent.

As well as this accounts for many of the fantastic confessions were recorded as having been made by witches.

Knowing that they had no hope of escape, they confessed whatever was required.

Much of their alleged crimes were an affront to anyone’s intelligence ­ in order to obtain a more merciful death.

The record of witch-burning in Europe as a whole is a sickening one.

How many people actually perished in the years of witch-hunting can only be guessed at.

It is a story which shames Protestant and Catholic alike.

Although the persecution of witches started under the Catholic Church, the Protestants carried it on with equal inhumanity.

The American authority, George Lincoln Burr, from his studies of the history of witchcraft, has given his opinion that a minimum of ten thousand men, women and children were burned for witchcraft in Germany alone.

It is true that Germany was a country in which the mania for persecution raged with particular fierceness.

Witch-hunting established itself as a profitable business.

The reason for this was not all witches were poor people by any means/

The property and estate of a convicted witch were confiscated, sometimes by the Church authorities, sometimes by the State, or even by the local feudal overlord, depending upon individual circumstances.

All the costs of the trial and execution were charged against the witch’s estate.

Grisly documents setting out the actual tariffs for burning witches in Scotland and elsewhere still exist.

The last witch-burning in the United Kingdom took place in Scotland on June 1722, when an old woman called Janet Horne was burned at
Dornoch on a charge of having lamed her daughter by witchcraft.

At least, this is the last Scottish witch-burning of which we have a definite historical record.

There are rumours of later executions in Scotland.

However, by this time in history not the quality of mercy but eighteenth-century scepticism and rationalism were putting the curb on the witch-hunters.

In 1736 witchcraft ceased to be a capital charge, in Scotland as well as England.

In 1743 this fact was publicly denounced by certain Scottish Churchmen, as being contrary to the express Law of God !

Before the Reformation in England, witches had been treated as heretics, and could be burned under the statute De Haeretico Comburendo, passed in 1401.

But before this date, witch-burnings were already being carried out in the British Isles, as in the case of Petronilla de Meath of Dame Alice Kyteler’s coven in Ireland in 1323.

Looking back at the horrifying records of the burning of witches, one is compelled to wonder how the human mind could consent to such
cruelty.

The answer seems to be that fear played a large part in it, the terror of black magic.

The Christian Church did not invent the punishment of death by burning.

There is the case of Theories, a Greek woman of Lemnos, mentioned by Demosthenes, who was publicly tried in Athens and burned for sorcery.

It is certain that people came to believe that a witch’s influence could only really be destroyed by her body being burnt.

In our own times, the remains of Rasputin, the occultist who was regarded as the evil genius of the Tzarist Court of Russia, were torn from their tomb and burned by the revolutionaries-an act that may have been something more than an expression of hatred alone.

Furthermore, on several occasions in the last twenty years, disturbing stories have leaked out of Mexico, of women being killed and their bodies burned, because they were believed to be witches.

The body of the revolutionary, Che Guevara, was burned and the ashes were scattered, by order of the authorities.

There were occasions in England when women were publicly burned at the stake, after the Reformation.

If a woman were found guilty of witchcraft which involved treason, for instance using occult means for an attempt upon the life of the sovereign, this was punishable by burning at the stake.

Also, for a woman to kill her husband, by witchcraft or any other means, was regarded as ‘petty treason’; and this too was punishable by burning at the stake.

Incredible as it appears, this sentence was actually carried out twice in Sussex as late as the eighteenth century.

In 1752 a woman called Anne Whale was publicly burned at the stake at Horsham for poisoning her husband.

Again in 1776, another woman, a Mrs Cruttenden, was found guilty of killing her husband by cutting his throat as he lay in bed ; · and she, too, was publicly burned at Horsham.

There was no mention of witchcraft in either case ; but this kind of execution, which as we have seen survived to an astonishingly late date, has often been mistaken for a witch-burning.

It is a psychologically interesting fact that it was not equally punishable for a man to kill his wife. This was murder, but not ‘petty treason’;
so it carried only a normal death sentence.

The horrific punishment of burning at the stake was in this instance meted out solely to women.

It seems likely that it was in some deep and unconscious way related to the old practice of burning witches.

The Persecution Of Witches

In medieval times, there were possibly many issues, political, religious, and otherwise, that brought about the persecution of witches.

Amongst other things, These issues included the religious emphasis on the sin of Eve and the belief in the inferiority of women.

The belief in the inferiority of women had existed since the time of St Paul.

With the rise of an organized male medical profession, women healers who had acted as herbalists and midwives were seen as a threat.

This was not least because their skills ensured less painful childbirth, which was considered contrary to the curse of God that the daughters of Eve should bear children in sorrow.

So midwives were a prime target for the new persecutions and were often accused of sacrificing babies to the Devil.

Given the high rate of infant mortality, this allegation was hard to refute.

A grieving mother might easily blame the midwife for the death of her infant.

At a time of appropriation of common land and the enclosure of smallholdings,  accusations of witchcraft were a popular way of removing peasants.

This could be particularly true for elderly widows or spinsters, reluctant to give up their land rights.

Being found guilty of witchcraft carried the penalty of the seizure of land.

Some researchers have suggested that as late as 1693 in Salem, Massachusetts, the desire to appropriate land was behind at least some of the mass accusations of witchcraft made at the time.

One landowner, Giles Corey, was apparently an innocent witness at the trials at first.

However, he himself was accused of witchcraft and was pressed to death –

This was a torture where heavy stones were placed on the victim’s chest, which took up to three days to kill them

High-ranking practitioners of magick who attempted to conjure demons were usually male and included both popes and royalty.

They generally escaped censure, however.

The folk religion of the countryside was an easier target.

In December 1484, the Bull of Pope Innocent VII was published, appointing Heinrich Kramer and Jakob Sprenger as inquisitors against witchcraft and heresy.

These two clerics wrote the Malleus Maleficarum, the notorious Hammer of the Witches, which described in lurid detail the tortures that
could be used to obtain confessions from suspected witches.

In it, they adopted the policy that it was better to kill an innocent person who would be rewarded in heaven by God than to allow a guilty
person to remain unpunished.

This book became the bestseller of its time and was quoted to justify the atrocities practiced against witches in mainland Europe and Scandinavia.

Although torture to obtain a confession was not permitted in England except by royal assent, many inquisitors were very cruel even to young victims, who would eventually confess in the hope of having their interrogation brought to an end.

No one really knows how many people have been put to death for witchcraft.

The worst period for witch burnings and hangings in Europe was between the mid-fifteenth and late seventeenth centuries when the number judicially executed as witches during this period is generally accepted to be about a quarter of a million people.

In addition, many more were lynched or hanged unofficially by mobs eager to find a scapegoat to blame for bad harvests or dying cattle.

This unhappy era came to be known as the Burning Times. Matthew Hopkins, who died in 1647, brought about the executions of at least 236 accused witches.

He styled himself as Witchfinder General and, with four hired assistants, instigated a reign of torture and terror especially in the eastern counties of England, amassing a huge fortune for himself in the process.

In the colonies of America, the most notorious trials were those at Salem, held between 1692 and 1693.

During this period of mass hysteria, 141 people from the town and immediate area were arrested, and 19 were hanged.

Even a dog was hanged.

Dorcas Good, a four-year-old child, was the youngest victim to be accused of witchcraft and imprisoned.

She was released on bail after her mother was hanged, but her younger sibling died in prison.

Dorcas was driven insane by her experience.

About three-quarters of all those killed as witches in Europe and Scandinavia were women, mainly lower-class older women, female healers, village herbalists, wise women, and midwives.

With the death of so many experienced healers and wise women, much knowledge was inevitably lost, and for a time infant mortality increased as male physicians took over the roles of the deposed midwives.

But anyone who was different in any way – eccentric, senile, or physically deformed – could be accused.

Any old woman living alone might be blamed for the deaths of animals, the failure of crops, and outbreaks of disease that were in reality caused by poor hygiene and diet, bad weather, human neglect, or simply blind Fate.

Of course, this occurred to some extent before the Burning Times.

The difference was that now the Church and State were legalizing and even encouraging this persecution.

Even faeries became associated with witchcraft.

The Bean-Tighe, a faerie housekeeper, popular in the mythology of Ireland and Scotland, was said to reside with the village wise woman and assist her with chores; in the worst of the wave of hysteria over witchcraft, if an old woman had an immaculate house, it was claimed she
had faerie help – and so by implication was consorting with the Devil.

Under torture, even the innocent would admit to the vile deeds suggested by their inquisitors.

Many of the confessions now appear to be remarkably uniform and come straight from the pages of the works on demonology, with which the members of the Inquisition would be familiar.

Simple village circle dances performed at the time of the full moon and the old rituals performed to bring fertility to both fields and people – with a figure dressed as the Horned God and couples making love in the fields or leaping over a bonfire – became all too easily translatable into evidence of satanic covens.

Although the last person executed for witchcraft in England was Alice Molland at Exeter in 1712, it was not until 1951 that the Witchcraft Act of 1736 was repealed and replaced with the Fraudulent Mediums Act.

Those who continued to practice the ‘old ways’ were usually families who could be trusted not to betray the secrets, although the fires of the Lughnassadh (the first corn harvest) continued in remote areas until well into the late nineteenth century and are being revived by pagans as community celebrations, especially in the USA.

The secret family covens would pass the traditions down through the matriarchal line, usually by word of mouth.

Those who could write recorded their spells and rituals in ‘Books of Shadows’ – so-called partly because of the secrecy required to write and protect them.

These were usually buried or burned with the witch on her death, or on rare occasions were handed on to the eldest daughter.